One might think that such a fundamental tool would have been redesigned a hundred times.
In reality, the crutch has crossed the centuries with very little true reinvention.
That is exactly what makes its modern developments so interesting.

What we do have is an anthropological certainty: whenever a human being could no longer walk normally, they used a stick, a support, a branch, something to lean on.

In other words, the prehistory of the crutch was probably the walking stick repurposed. It is reasonable to say that the function came long before the specialised object. The trouble is that wood leaves few traces, so archaeology is not exactly generous here.

The idea is probably extremely old; the material evidence comes later.

Egyptian figure using an axillary crutch — possibly a person with leprosy or affected by poliovirus.

The first solid references to the use of crutches come from Ancient Egypt. There are general mentions of their use in Egyptian antiquity, and above all a funerary representation of a person using a crutch dated to around the 15th–14th centuries BCE.

Egyptian stela thought to show a victim of poliovirus or leprosy, 18th Dynasty (1580–1350 BCE).


At this point, then, the crutch already exists not as a vague idea, but as an identifiable object.

What stands out next is less the evolution than the absence of spectacular evolution. During classical antiquity and then the Middle Ages, the crutch remained essentially a variation on a wooden support:

  • a shaft,
  • support under the arm, at the elbow or at the hand,
  • sometimes more refined workmanship,
  • but no major conceptual break.

Detail from a miniature of an allegorical figure with crutches representing Old Age, Roman de la Rose (Harley 4425, fol. 10v), c. 1490–1500, Southern Netherlands (Bruges).

In other words, for centuries, craftsmanship was refined; the tool itself was not reinvented.

The crutch moves through history as an almost humiliatingly simple object:
it works well enough to survive, so it does not attract the same frenzy of innovation as weapons, ships or machines.
That continuity is neatly summed up by the fact that the “classic” form is still recognisable today.

Two classic T-shaped crutches, 1863 — John Burns of Gettysburg.

With industrialisation, the crutch gradually stopped being merely a piece of local carpentry.
It entered a logic of standardised manufacturing.

The real change was not philosophical; it was industrial: more uniform materials, reproducible parts, adjustments that were easier to repeat. But the function remained the same.

The crutch did not suddenly become an “intelligent” object.
It simply became better made.

A frequently cited landmark in modern history is Emile Schlick’s 1917 patent for the first commercially produced crutch. Here, at last, there is a clear marker of modernity:

Precise chronology of the “Schlick cane”
  • 1915: Émile Schlick, a civil engineer in Nancy, designs his prototype support cane to help soldiers injured in the First World War.
  • 1916: he officially files his patent applications, including the American version on 5 May 1916.
  • 1917: the patent is granted and published (no. US1244249A), marking the start of large-scale commercialisation.

At that time, the crutch did not yet look like today’s lightweight aluminium models, but it already included the key innovations of the modern forearm crutch:

© Private collection — American poster showing a Schlick-type cane. The caption reads: “The Crutch We Want”.

  • The shaft: a straight cane, often made of wood or solid metal, ending in a rubber tip.
  • The handgrip: a horizontal handle located about 20–25 cm below the top of the cane, allowing weight to be unloaded through the hand.
  • The forearm support: the major innovation. It was a semi-circular fork, or angled cuff, fixed to the top of an oblique rod to hold the forearm securely and stabilise walking.

The invention became known as a “support cane with forearm rest” and transformed everyday life for injured users by avoiding the nerve pain caused by older axillary, or underarm, crutches.

Later, A. R. Lofstrand Jr. developed crutches with height adjustment, helping to establish the modern forearm-crutch model.

In Europe, this type eventually became dominant.

Again, this was real progress, but not a revolution comparable to what happened in other technical fields in the 20th century.
The geometry was improved, manufacturing was rationalised, adjustments were added.

© Private collection. American poster presenting a Schlick-type forearm crutch. The caption reads: “The crutch we want.”

If we take “50 years ago” as a marker, roughly the 1970s, the picture is almost ironic:

  • the world already had colour television,
  • modern computing was underway,
  • aviation had changed scale,
  • and the crutch still looked rather furiously like… a crutch.

Of course, aluminium became more common, as did moulded handles, plastic cuffs and better-standardised industrial series. But fundamentally, it was still the same ancestral technical gesture: a vertical support replacing part of the function of the leg.

Today, the crutch remains an ancient object that has, in substance, changed very little.

Recent versions with springs, energy return or more sophisticated geometry do exist, but they remain marginal compared with the classic model.

The historical observation is clear: manufacturing has been improved enormously, but the real walking experience with crutches has been reinvented only very little.

2011: the first ERGODYNAMIC crutch with a patented shock-absorption system appears



The historical finding is rather harsh: we have devoted wild amounts of creativity to technologies for comfort, leisure and distraction, while a tool as basic as the crutch was long treated as a simple stick with a slightly better finish.

References ↷
  • Hernigou P. Crutch art painting in the middle age as orthopaedic heritage. PMC, 2014.
  • Liu X et al. Incidence and dynamics of mobility device use among… PMC, 2024.
  • Schlick E. US1244249A – Walking-stick, brevet délivré en 1917.
  • Lofstrand A.R. Jr. US2711183A – Crutch.
  • US5458143A – Crutch with elbow and shank springs.
  • Dolhem R. La canne en T d’André Maginot. J Readapt Med. 1915;19(3):86–90. [Google Scholar]
  • Hernigou P. Ambroise Paré II: Paré’s contributions to amputation and ligature. Int Orthop. 2013;37(4):769–722. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1857-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hernigou P. Ambroise Paré III: Paré’s contributions to surgical instruments and surgical instruments at the time of Ambroise Paré. Int Orthop. 2013;37(5):975–980. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1872-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hernigou P. Ambroise Paré IV: the early history of artificial limbs (from robotic to prostheses) Int Orthop. 2013;37(6):1195–1197. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1884-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Le Vay D. The history of orthopaedics. Carnforth: The Parthenon Publishing Group; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • Schlick E (1915) Canne-soutien à appui fixe ou flexible de l’avant-bras. Brevet d’invention no 479.036, demandé le 7 mai 1915, délivré le 13 novembre 1915. République française. Office national de la propriété industrielle. p 3
  • Tuffier T, Amar J. Cannes et béquilles en orthopédie dynamique (1915) Modèle scientifique d’une canne-soutien. Académie des Sciences, séance du 13 septembre 1915. Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances. Tome 161, juillet–décembre 1915, pp 302–304